Indian evidence act 1872 in tamil language. 100 sample questions on The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 for Maharashtra Judiciary Examination (preliminary) 2019-02-16
Indian evidence act 1872 in tamil language Rating:
7,7/10
1519
reviews
THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT 1872 CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY India Bareacts
The fact that A had accepted other bills drawn in the same manner before they could have been transmitted to him by the payee if the payee had been a real person, is relevant, as showing that A knew that the payee was a fictitious person. Proof of admissions against persons making them, and by or on their behalf. Burden of proof is on the party claiming to prove the substance of the issue to the satisfaction of the court. Appreciation of such evidence would depend upon the strength and trustworthiness of witness. Facts of which Court must take judicial notice. As to statements made to a police officer investigating a case, see the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 2 of 1974 , sec.
100 sample questions on The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 for Maharashtra Judiciary Examination (preliminary)
Testimony to facts stated in document mentioned in section 159. The fact that, at the time when he left home, he had sudden and urgent business at the place to which he went, is relevant, as tending to explain the fact that he left home suddenly. When there is a question whether a particular act was done, the existence of any course of business, according to which it naturally would have been done, is a relevant fact. Ins by Act 3 of 1891, sec. The fact that public notice of the loss of the property had been given in the place where A was, is relevant, as showing that A did not in good faith believe that the real owner of the property could not be found.
WritingLaw is not by a group or company but just me. It was held that the test identification parade regarding accused was not conducted properly and suffered from unexplained delay. Presumption as to books, maps and charts. The cries of the mob are relevant as explanatory of the nature of the transaction. A is accused of defaming B by publishing an imputation intended to harm the reputation of B. Right of adverse party as to writing used to refresh memory. It has been accepted by both the courts below and we find no reason to discard it.
Opinion to be received with great caution The opinion of a handwriting expert given in evidence is no less fallible than any other expert opinion adduced in evidence with the result that such evidence has to be received with great caution; Ram Narain v. It is unenforceable as against the Petitioner-Company. Illustration The question is, whether a given letter is in the underwriting of A, a merchant in London. A statement of the price, made by a deceased banya in the ordinary course of his business is a relevant fact. It had noting to do with carrying the conspiracy into effect; Mirza Akbar v. Silence does not per-se amounts to communication- Bank of India Ltd. Thus, if the court could gather from the demeanour of the witness about the identity of the accused is reliable on the basis of permanent engravement of the image of the accused, there is no hurdle whatsoever, in relying upon such testimony whereby the witness proves the identity of the accused as the person involved in the offence.
Statement made by A during his illness as to his symptoms is relevant facts. In a criminal proceeding, the accused must be proved beyond all reasonable doubts. In criminal cases, previous good character relevant. The book is sure to be useful to the law students. A is accused of the dishonest misappropriation of property which he had found, and the question is whether, when he appropriated it, he believed in good faith that the real owner could not be found. Such facts explain the fact in issue or relevant fact.
Illustrations A writing 5 is a document; Words printed, lithographed or photographed are documents; A map or plan is a document; An inscription on a metal plate or stone is a document; A caricature is a document. Prior to the introduction of this act, the rules of admissibility of evidence in our Indian courts were based on traditional systems. The fact that at the time when he left home he had sudden and urgent business at the place to which he went is relevant, as tending to explain the fact that he left home suddenly. The wife of the deceased was natural witness. Illustrations a A is tried for the murder of B by beating him with a club with the intention of causing his death. In criminal cases, the evidence of good character is admissible generally. Parties to civil suit, and their wives or husbands.
When consideration is given simultaneously with promise, it is said to be present consideration. Anything of which judicial notice can be taken is evidence. They are:- -Alien enemy -Foreign sovereigns, diplomatic staff etc. Illustration A book-keeper may testify to facts recorded by him in books regularly kept in the course of business, if he knows that the books were correctly kept, although he has forgotten the particular transactions entered. Illustration The right of the villagers of a particular village to use the water of a particular well is a general right within the meaning of this section. He makes an entry showing that on a particular occasion he received less than he really did receive. The facts that, not long before the date of the alleged Will, A made inquiry into matters to which the provisions of the alleged Will relate, that he consulted vakils in reference to making the Will, and that he caused drafts or other Wills to be prepared of which he did not approve, are relevant.
Promise 2 b :- A Proposal when accepted becomes a promise. Comment: Admissibility is substantive evidence of the fact- Admissibility is substantive evidence of the fact admitted while a previous statement used to contradict a witness does not become substantive evidence and merely serves the purpose of throwing doubt on the veracity of the witness. Presumption as to Gazettes, newspapers, private Acts of Parliament and other documents. Opinion as to handwriting, when relevant. Related Case- Life Insurance Corporation of India v.
Proof of cession of territory. Confession of a co-accused, not required to be on oath and cannot be tested by cross- examination I. Illustrations a A is accused of the murder of B by beating him. This was amended first by the Repeating and Amending Act, 1914 10 of 1914 and than by the A. The Act was passed by and is based on the principles of. In short there was no uniform method.
