The low number of college-enrolled African Americans does not affirm so; nor does the figures in the 2001 and 2002 College-Board Seniors National Report. Opponents of affirmative action argue that this violates the 14th Amendment, creates reverse discrimination and reinforces racial inequality. It was designed to make sure employers recognized different races when picking out candidates for jobs of applicants to universities. In 1954, the supreme court decision Brown v. The Greens decide to have only two children, to spend all their resources on them, and to give them the best education. The purpose of equal employment Legally, affirmative action refers to policies offering compensation to groups formerly targeted for discrimination and identified along social cleavages racial groups in the United States and South Africa, and religious groups in Northern Ireland. The opponents of affirmative action are many, and their arguments are multifaceted, with conflicting views prevalent even among would-be allies against this practice.
If you analyze different viewpoints on the problem in the essay on affirmative action, you are sure to show your analytical abilities. Not only do the advocates back their claims of inequality, they show how, in many ways, minorities in this country are hardly better off than they were when affirmative action was first implemented. By Strong Affirmative Action I mean preferential treatment on the basis of race, ethnicity or gender or some other morally irrelevant criterion , discriminating in favor of under-represented groups against over-represented groups, aiming at roughly equal results. But here a specific people have been identified who were wronged in an identifiable way by the government of the nation in question. Through this paper, the concepts of affirmative action will be analyzed and discussed.
Even though you might be the most qualified for the job you still might not obtain the position. One of the biggest problems facing U. With laws that shut them in fear and torture and treatment that rendered them helpless, the African slaves aimed hopelessly for educational opportunities that bypassed them. The entire Act was amended to represent a less passive policy, as opposed to the very passive policy of 1964. There is no more moral requirement to guarantee that 12% of professors are Black than to guarantee that 85% of the players in the National Basketball Association are White. The main goal of Affirmative Action is to generate more diversity and equal opportunities in jobs or schools that used to be all or mainly male, white, or both. This creates internal strife, lower efficiency in the workplace, and increased racial hostility.
If a recruitment preference is given to a less qualified applicant, have initiatives in place to keep them employed and on par with everyone else. However, in order to blend race, culture, and genders to create a stable and diverse society, someone has to give. One of the most common misconceptions of affirmative action is that it sanctions quotas based on race or some other essential group category such as gender. After all those years, is American education now a matured, apolitical institution free from the stench of racial bigotry? Others that disagree with it and find it unfair simply see it as another form of discrimination, giving one group extra advantages based upon nothing… 1160 Words 5 Pages Affirmative Action Marlene S. In 1980, Congress enacted the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act, which prohibited discrimination based on prior institutionalization. White government officials and programs have often favored the racial and political-economic interests of white Americans. As I argued in I.
These affirmative action plans were to contain a recruitment program by which they plan to eliminate the underrepresentation of minorities in certain job categories. Originally, Affirmative Action arose because of President Lyndon B. In his essay, Sandel asks whether it On the contrary, supports of affirmative action feel that this law is still needed in America to help places of higher education have more diversity which will benefit companies in the long run and it also helps companies be more diverse and it helps them thrive. While universities do try to admit students from socioeconomic disadvantage, there are many more poor white students than minorities. Discrimination of women in the workplace m denial of admission to college, refusal to hire based on race, are all current issues in our society.
Equality has always been a topic of debate when it comes to American political system. The debate will continue until minorities are represented in every job class and type. The most famous impetus for this sociological development was the civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s, which produced wide gains in the public sphere for African Americans. People have to take some responsibility for their actions. So that each group receives its fair share, we should ensure that 12% of the philosophers in the United States are Black, reduce the percentage of Jews from an estimated 15% to 2% - firing about 1,300 Jewish philosophers. Everyone has the opportunity to be a great addition to society. Rarely do companies plan downsizing strategies that include consideration of workforce diversity.
Our nation has interpreted this statement differently since it was written, and still,. But, my thesis is, however tragic the situation may be and we may disagree on just how tragic it is , one policy is not a legitimate part of the solution and that is reverse, unjust discrimination against young white males. Furthermore, limits the opportunities of one person who may fit the description but not the proper race category. One of the goals is to make sure that many people are made aware of job openings as possible to ensure that the applicant pool is reflective of the number of people, who are qualified. However, many minorities, even liberal ones, are also opposed to affirmative action, if not as a concept, then to the way it is implemented in the U. One can see that the affirmative action policy envisioned in 1964 has been updated because of many landmark court cases and government mandates.
The Supreme Court upholds these policy programs to ensure that people of minority groups are getting an equal chance at opportunities that they otherwise might not have been able to attain due to discrimination. In recent years, many people have called this policy into question. Martin Luther said that humanity is like a man mounting a horse who always tends to fall off on the other side of the horse. Why does society have to step in and help them? Present Affirmative Action is both racist and sexist. Affirmative Action sometimes causes this because companies have to hire a certain number of minorities relative to the size of the company. The focus of current research is an attempt to either justify or deny the use of affirmative action within current practices through various higher education institutions, and though any one person could potentially be swayed to side with the rationale to maintain its use or disregard, the facts are quite clear that the future of this practice is unclear.